感觉都不是很好。作者: Roger 时间: 2011-10-2 16:11
Pinging 216.12.196.114 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=49
会慢吗???作者: 我是小白 时间: 2011-10-2 16:12
是不怎么样!作者: fw5000 时间: 2011-10-2 16:12
Pinging 216.12.196.114 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 216.12.196.114:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 202ms, Maximum = 208ms, Average = 205ms作者: whhuazi 时间: 2011-10-2 16:13
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽作者: renothing 时间: 2011-10-2 16:13
ntt是在不怎么样
8 59.43.247.106 (59.43.247.106) 37.966 ms 37.960 ms 37.988 ms
9 59.43.246.174 (59.43.246.174) 37.831 ms 37.868 ms 37.923 ms
10 59.43.246.165 (59.43.246.165) 186.072 ms 186.070 ms 186.065 ms
11 * * *
12 xe-0-4-0-0.r06.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.8.5) 288.005 ms 285.949 ms 286.156 ms
13 ae-6.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.5.12) 200.644 ms 200.646 ms 200.676 ms
14 as-2.r20.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.35) 197.321 ms 230.062 ms 230.058 ms
15 ae-2.r25.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.93) 196.438 ms 184.601 ms 191.832 ms
16 xe-1-0-0.r20.tokyjp03.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129) 199.843 ms 199.934 ms 253.202 ms
17 xe-2-0-0.r20.tokyjp03.jp.ce.gin.ntt.net (61.213.145.38) 190.597 ms 190.361 ms 188.296 ms
18 ae1.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com (50.97.18.165) 261.845 ms 261.822 ms 262.743 ms
19 ae5.dar01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.197) 260.145 ms 260.398 ms 260.296 ms
20 po1.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (174.133.118.131) 261.730 ms 261.770 ms 263.291 ms
21 speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com (216.12.196.114) 263.540 ms 264.627 ms 264.616 ms
深圳电信ADSL:
PING 216.12.196.114 (216.12.196.114): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=250.196 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=249.927 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=246.979 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=251.452 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=245.583 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=247.768 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=251.158 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=251.182 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=8 ttl=47 time=250.103 ms
64 bytes from 216.12.196.114: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=249.522 ms
^C
--- 216.12.196.114 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 245.583/249.387/251.452/1.871 ms
PING还没有SS低作者: lxfy 时间: 2011-10-2 17:45
联通非常不行,500多作者: 瘦够了 时间: 2011-10-2 17:52
NTT线路不太适合IDC业务,日本的KDDI比较合适作者: baqfhwqqq 时间: 2011-10-2 17:55
正在 Ping 216.12.196.114 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=206ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=205ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=211ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=216ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=204ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=205ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=210ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=209ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=207ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=210ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=212ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=208ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=218ms TTL=51
来自 216.12.196.114 的回复: 字节=32 时间=207ms TTL=51
请求超时。作者: hz555 时间: 2011-10-2 17:56 比香港的差多了作者: 活猪 时间: 2011-10-2 18:25
8 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms 202.97.53.189
9 485 ms 511 ms 511 ms p4-0-1-3.r22.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [61.120.
146.53]
10 531 ms 614 ms 511 ms ae-3.r25.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.1
57]
11 537 ms 511 ms 511 ms xe-1-0-0.r20.tokyjp03.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.3.129]
12 417 ms 426 ms 511 ms xe-2-0-0.r20.tokyjp03.jp.ce.gin.ntt.net [61.213.
145.38]
13 548 ms 614 ms 514 ms ae1.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
165]
14 523 ms 511 ms 511 ms ae5.dar01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
197]
15 543 ms 511 ms 511 ms po1.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com [174.133.1
18.131]
16 608 ms 614 ms 614 ms 216.12.196.114